翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ "O" Is for Outlaw
・ "O"-Jung.Ban.Hap.
・ "Ode-to-Napoleon" hexachord
・ "Oh Yeah!" Live
・ "Our Contemporary" regional art exhibition (Leningrad, 1975)
・ "P" Is for Peril
・ "Pimpernel" Smith
・ "Polish death camp" controversy
・ "Pro knigi" ("About books")
・ "Prosopa" Greek Television Awards
・ "Pussy Cats" Starring the Walkmen
・ "Q" Is for Quarry
・ "R" Is for Ricochet
・ "R" The King (2016 film)
・ "Rags" Ragland
・ ! (album)
・ ! (disambiguation)
・ !!
・ !!!
・ !!! (album)
・ !!Destroy-Oh-Boy!!
・ !Action Pact!
・ !Arriba! La Pachanga
・ !Hero
・ !Hero (album)
・ !Kung language
・ !Oka Tokat
・ !PAUS3
・ !T.O.O.H.!
・ !Women Art Revolution


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

best linear unbiased prediction : ウィキペディア英語版
best linear unbiased prediction
In statistics, best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) is used in linear mixed models for the estimation of random effects. BLUP was derived by Charles Roy Henderson in 1950 but the term "best linear unbiased predictor" (or "prediction") seems not to have been used until 1962.〔
〕 "Best linear unbiased predictions" (BLUPs) of random effects are similar to best linear unbiased estimates (BLUEs) (see Gauss–Markov theorem) of fixed effects. The distinction arises because it is conventional to talk about ''estimating'' fixed effects but ''predicting'' random effects, but the two terms are otherwise equivalent. (This is a bit strange since the random effects have already been "realized" − they already exist. The use of the term "prediction" may be because in the field of animal breeding in which Henderson worked, the random effects were usually genetic merit, which could be used to predict the quality of offspring (Robinson〔 page 28)). However, the equations for the "fixed" effects and for the random effects are different.
In practice, it is often the case that the parameters associated with the random effect(s) term(s) are unknown; these parameters are the variances of the random effects and residuals. Typically the parameters are estimated and plugged into the predictor, leading to the Empirical Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (EBLUP). Notice that by simply plugging in the estimated parameter into the predictor, additional variability is unaccounted for, leading to overly optimistic prediction variances for the EBLUP.
Best linear unbiased predictions are similar to empirical Bayes estimates of random effects in linear mixed models, except that in the latter case, where weights depend on unknown values of components of variance, these unknown variances are replaced by sample-based estimates.
==Example==

Suppose that the model for observations is written as
:Y_j= \mu + x_j^T\beta +\xi_j + \varepsilon_j, \,
where ''ξj'' and ''εj'' represent the random effect and observation error for observation ''j'', and suppose they are uncorrelated and have known variances ''σξ''2 and ''σε''2, respectively. Further, ''xj'' is a vector of independent variables for the ''j''th observation and ''β'' is a vector of regression parameters. The BLUP problem of providing an estimate of the observation-error-free value for the ''k''th observation,
:\tilde= \mu + x_k^T\beta +\xi_k ,
can be formulated as requiring that the coefficients of a linear predictor, defined as
:\widehat= \sum_^n c_ Y_j ,
should be chosen so as to minimise the variance of the prediction error,
:V= \operatorname(\tilde- \widehat),
subject to the condition that the predictor is unbiased,
:\operatorname(\tilde- \widehat)=0 .

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「best linear unbiased prediction」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.